Monday, March 22, 2010

McLuhan: It's All Going According to Marshall's Plan

"McLuhan: It's All Going According to Marshall's Plan" by Mark Edmundson is a fantastic article with a lot of insight into our generation and the way the types of media are affecting us. Through reading about the depth experience and depth participation, I could not help myself but to think of a few of my own examples of this from 2010.

A perfect example of a role-playing game where one takes on the view and persona of an animation, is the game The Sims. With the newer versions of this game, you can actually make the Sim look so much like yourself, down to birthmarks, pimples and freckles. After creating a virtual person that can look identical to the real you, one then commands it to do things, as if they were living that life themselves. This really intrigues the player to be right in the game, as "one self-contained unit".





Another quote from the reading that reminded me of something from the 21st century was, "Some day, perhaps, a clothes shopper will be able to see, beamed into his living room, a three-dimensional image of himself in a suit before he buys" (66-67). Although I have not heard of this, I have heard of a game that allows you to upload a picture of your face, and then try on different styles and colors of hair to see how a new hairdo would look. Sounds pretty similar, and pretty scary. These interactive systems really get the player involved in the game and are extremely reflective of real life.




This all goes in hand with Edmundson's idea of perceptual numbing. With all of the types of video and computer games today, nothing phases us. If a baby is shown at two years old how to virtually play with a Dog on Nintendo DS, or is shown how to shoot people on Call of Duty at age three, by the time they are teenagers, nothing can surprise them. He is absolutely correct when he says, "...perceptual numbing may be the loss of our individual capacity to respond to anything but the most violent stimuli" (68). We have become so accustomed to the different types of games and all the violence found on them, that nothing causes a response anymore. Many kids and teenagers have a better time living their life through a virtual reality game than actually going out into the real world. And this is exactly what the biggest downfall of the 21st century generation is.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Week #9 Assignment

The independent news source I have found and will continue to use for this semester is the Star Ledger Newspaper, which is the largest newspaper in the state of New Jersey. It is based in Newark, New Jersey. I have always enjoyed reading this newspaper because it gives a good amount of information on what is happening all over New Jersey, while sometimes having different perspectives than the large ownership companies that seem to be everywhere today.

OWNERSHIP

The Star Ledger is owned by Advance Publications, an American media company owned by the Newhouse Family. They own over 30 different newspapers, different business journals, periodicals and magazines,some internet websites and even a few Cable television news channels. Advance Publications owns Condé Nast Publications, Parade Publications, Fairchild Publications, American City Business Journals and the Golf Digest Companies.

CREDIBILITY

The Newark Star-Ledger's daily circulation is larger than the next two largest New Jersey newspapers combined and its Sunday circulation is larger than the next THREE papers combined. It was founded in 1832 and has won the Pulitzer Prize for Breaking News Reporting in 2005 for its coverage of the resignation of the Governor of New Jersey Jim McGreevey, after he confessed to adultery with a male lover. The paper awards the Star-Ledger Trophy each year to high school teams that end up as the number one team in their respective sport in the state of New Jersey. Overall, the newspaper has been around for a while and has always been ranked as one if not the best newspapers in New Jersey. It is also very credible for its large and well-known ownership.

CONTENT

The Star-Ledger is a daily newspaper reporting on news of all 21 counties in New Jersey. It contains the sections of: opinion, sports, business, high-school sports, obituaries, entertainment, and home and garden with columnists and staff blogs. There are also news sections by towns and by county. The Star-Ledger also has a website, where news can be found everyday, 24 hours a day. There are videos, blogs, photos and local updates.

MY COMPARISON

The Star-Ledger newspaper can be compared to The New York Post, owned by News Corporation. It is a newspaper that reports on the news for certain sections of New York and has the same type of sections and areas of news.

Friday, February 26, 2010

Week #7 Assignment

Net Neutrality


What is it?
: Net neutrality is the principle that says all information flowing across the internet should be treated equally. This allows the network to carry every form of information and support every kind of application. The theory behind the network neutrality principle, which the internet sometimes gets close to, is that a neutral network should be expected to deliver the most to a nation and the world economically and socially. The argument is whether companies for the internet should be allowed to charge providers for the privilege of reaching viewers.


Questions about it?:
The biggest question about net neutrality seems to be the simple question of, "What is neutral?". Everyone's ideas of neutrality seem to differ, causing this issue to have several problems. Another question is what business models are the phone and cable companies attempting to preserve by opposing Net Neutrality. Most of the questions surrounding this issue seem to be directed towards the companies themselves and ask about motives and where this issue seems to be heading.


Who is for/against it?:
Companies that are FOR net neutrality such as Google, Yahoo, Vonage, Ebay, Amazon, IAC and Microsoft. Some companies that are AGAINST net neutrality are large hardware companies and members of the cable and telecommunications industries. Other companies against net neutrality are Cato Institute, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Goldwater Institute and Americans for Tax Reform.

My thoughts: I would have to say that I am for net neutrality. I think it makes sense to have everything equal on the internet and that in the end, all these raising of fees will all come down to the consumers, us. I do not like the idea of telecommunication companies controlling what sites can be visited and when it is allowed to view them. I feel like if the internet is not broken, why fix it? The net is safe, fair and neutral the way it is right now--with our choice of websites, our choice of when and where to visit and our choice of the experience we receive from them. The more government intervention and regulation that comes about, the less neutral and free the internet is going to be. I use many sites such as Google, Amazon and Youtube, and though it sounds horrible to say - I would definitely have a hard time without them. I also do not agree with the censorship that would change if there is not net neutrality. My beliefs have sparked from these 3 outside sources:

ARTICLE: http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/06/09/newmark.internet/

VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iqw2tgw5mE

INTERVIEW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mE48TqymnR0

Sunday, February 21, 2010

Week #6 Assignment

February 23, 2010
http://bluegrassfilmsociety.blogspot.com/2008_04_01_archive.html

I thought this image concerning the issue with the Pentagon propaganda and military analysts was extremely strong and relevant. The quote is a perfect representation of how Americans felt after hearing the news about the Pentagon's program. It is an image obviously against the way the media is informing the public and giving biased information about the war, according to the way the Pentagon wants it. So, the "compared to what lies right to our faces" is a clear blow to these military analysts. What happened yesterday and what is going to happen tomorrow does not even matter if we are getting lied to with the wrong information.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQP7ASBdwdo&feature=player_embedded

I chose this interview/video from YouTube because of the different angle it gives on the topic by seeing people live and hearing interviews. It does oppose the Pentagon's military analysts and explains how these men are supposed to be giving objective assessments of the war and instead are just giving biased information. I like how it ties into the New York Times article we were supposed to read and used quotes from it for support. Since I had not seen this issue on the news, I thought it was important to be able to watch some coverage on this link.




http://captainplaid.blogspot.com/2008_05_01_archive.html

I also thought that this image was a great representation of the issue at hand. The media images on the ball and chain just go to show how much the government and the media controls our eyes. These military analysts can (and do) literally omit anything they choose while only informing the public on the biased information that they feel necessary. It is as if America is wrapped right within this ball and chain. There is no better way to show how far the media and the Pentagon has taken advantage over the people.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/21/pentagon-military-analyst_n_242305.html

I chose this article because it gives a different perspective on this issue: that the Pentagon did NOT break the propaganda rule. It is said in the article that although the Pentagon did try to influence the public opinion, there is no proof that they tried to conceal it. There was also no evidence that these military analysts were paid for this positive commentary. Since the New York Times article was an article against this Pentagon propaganda, reading a different view of the issue helps to see the problem from both angles.



Overall, this issue only added to my anger about the biased news we get from the media. However, it did not surprise me in the least. I actually hate watching the news, simply because I know whatever they are reporting on is either half of the story or is going to give me nightmares. Sometimes, I would rather just not know. I was not surprised because the government can do whatever they want. They can completely make up stories on the media and the American people would have no idea. I do not agree with these military analysts reporting on only positive aspects of the war and I think it is absurd that with a war concerning OUR country, we are not getting the right information. In my opinion, they were completely against the federal law.